Book I

Fundamentals of Plane Geometry Involving Straight-Lines

Table of Contents

Book I

Fundamentals of Plane Geometry Involving Straight-Lines

Theory of angles, triangles, parallel lines, and parallelograms.

sections

Definitions

Postulates

Common Notions

Propositions

Definitions

elements

Definition I.1

Point

Definition I.2

Line

Definition I.3

Extremities

Definition I.4

Straight Line

Definition I.5

Surface

Definition I.6

Extremities of a Surface

Definition I.7

Plane Surface

Definition I.8

Plane Angle

Definition I.9

Rectilineal Angle

Definition I.10

Right (Perpendicular) Angle

Definition I.11

Obtuse Angle

Definition I.12

Acute Angle

Definition I.13

Boundary

Definition I.14

Figure

Definition I.15

Circle

Definition I.16

Center

Definition I.17

Diameter

Definition I.18

Semicircle

Definition I.19

Rectilineal Figures

Definition I.20

Trilateral Figures

Definition I.21

Right Triangle

Definition I.22

Quadrilateral Figures

Definition I.23

Parallel Straight Lines

Definition I.1

Point

A point is that which has no part.

Definition I.2

Line

A line is breadthless length.

Definition I.3

Extremities

The extremities of a line are points.

Definition I.4

Straight Line

A straight line is a line which lies evenly with the points on itself.

Definition I.5

Surface

A surface is that which has length and breadth only.

Definition I.6

Extremities of a Surface

The extremities of a surface are lines.

Definition I.7

Plane Surface

A plane surface is a surface which lies evenly with the straight lines on itself.

Definition I.8

Plane Angle

A plane angle is the inclination to one another of two lines in a plane which meet one another and do not lie in a straight line.

Definition I.9

Rectilineal Angle

And when the lines containing the angle are straight, the angle is called rectilineal.

Definition I.10

Right (Perpendicular) Angle

When a straight line set up on a straight line makes the adjacent angles equal to one another, each of the equal angles is right, and the straight line standing on the other is called a perpendicular to that on which it stands.

Definition I.11

Obtuse Angle

An obtuse angle is an angle greater than a right angle.

Definition I.12

Acute Angle

An acute angle is an angle less than a right angle.

Definition I.13

Boundary

A boundary is that which is an extremity of anything.

Definition I.14

Figure

A figure is that which is contained by any boundary or boundaries.

Definition I.15

Circle

A circle is a plane figure contained by one line such that all the straight lines falling upon it from one point among those lying within the figure are equal to one another;

Definition I.16

Center

And the point is called the centre of the circle.

Definition I.17

Diameter

A diameter of the circle is any straight line drawn through the centre and terminated in both directions by the circumference of the circle, and such a straight line also bisects the circle.

Definition I.18

Semicircle

A semicircle is the figure contained by the diameter and the circumference cut off by it. And the centre of the semicircle is the same as that of the circle.

Definition I.19

Rectilineal Figures

Rectilineal figures

Definition I.20

Trilateral Figures

Of trilateral figures, an equilateral triangle is that which has its three sides equal, an isosceles triangle that which has two of its sides alone equal, and a scalene triangle that which has its three sides unequal.

Definition I.21

Right Triangle

Further, of trilateral figures, a right-angled triangle is that which has a right angle, an obtuse-angled triangle that which has an obtuse angle, and an acute angled triangle that which has its three angles acute.

Definition I.22

Quadrilateral Figures

Of quadrilateral figures, a square is that which is both equilateral and right-angled; an oblong that which is right-angled but not equilateral; a rhombus that which is equilateral but not right-angled; and a rhomboid that which has its opposite sides and angles equal to one another but is neither equilateral nor right-angled. And let quadrilaterals other than these be called trapezia.

Definition I.23

Parallel Straight Lines

Parallel straight lines are straight lines which, being in the same plane and being produced indefinitely in both directions, do not meet one another in either direction.

Postulates

elements

Postulate I.1

Draw a Straight Line

Postulate I.2

Finite Straight Line

Postulate I.3

Describe a Circle

Postulate I.4

Right Angles are Equal

Postulate I.5

Non Parallel Lines

Postulate I.1

Draw a Straight Line

To draw a straight line from any point to any point.

Postulate I.2

Finite Straight Line

To produce a finite straight line continuously in a straight line.

Postulate I.3

Describe a Circle

To describe a circle with any centre and distance.

Postulate I.4

Right Angles are Equal

That all right angles are equal to one another.

Postulate I.5

Non Parallel Lines

That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side on which are the angles less than the two right angles.

Common Notions

elements

Common Notion I.1

Common Notion I.2

Common Notion I.3

Common Notion I.4

Common Notion I.5

Common Notion I.1

Things which are equal to the same thing are also equal to one another.

Common Notion I.2

If equals be added to equals, the wholes are equal.

Common Notion I.3

If equals be subtracted from equals, the remainders are equal.

Common Notion I.4

Things which coincide with one another are equal to one another.

Common Notion I.5

The whole is greater than the part.

Propositions

elements

Proposition I.1

Construct an Equilateral Triangle on a Segment

Proposition I.2

Construct equal segments by extension

Proposition I.3

Construct equal segments by section

Proposition I.4

Triangles with Equal Sides have equal angles

Proposition I.5

The base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal

Proposition I.6

Proposition I.7

Proposition I.8

Proposition I.9

Proposition I.10

Proposition I.11

Proposition I.12

Proposition I.13

Proposition I.14

Proposition I.15

Proposition I.16

Proposition I.17

Proposition I.18

Proposition I.19

Proposition I.20

Proposition I.21

Proposition I.22

Proposition I.23

Proposition I.24

Proposition I.25

Proposition I.26

Proposition I.27

Proposition I.28

Proposition I.29

Proposition I.30

Proposition I.31

Proposition I.32

Proposition I.33

Proposition I.34

Proposition I.35

Proposition I.36

Proposition I.37

Proposition I.38

Proposition I.39

Proposition I.40

Proposition I.41

Proposition I.42

Proposition I.43

Proposition I.44

Proposition I.45

Proposition I.46

Proposition I.47

Proposition I.48

Proposition I.1

Construct an Equilateral Triangle on a Segment

On a given finite straight line 1 to construct an equilateral triangle.

Let AB be the given finite straight line.2

Thus it is required to construct an equilateral triangle on the straight line AB.

With centre A and distance AB let the circle BCD be described3; I.post.3 again, with centre B and distance BA let the circle ACE be described; I.post.3 and from the point C4, in which the circles cut one another, to the points A, B let the straight lines CA, CB be joined. I.post.1

Now, since the point A is the centre of the circle CDB,

Again, since the point B is the centre of the circle CAE,

But CA was also proved equal to AB; therefore each of the straight lines CA, CB is equal to AB.

And things which are equal to the same thing are also equal to one another; I.c.n.1

Therefore the three straight lines CA, AB, BC are equal to one another.5

Therefore the triangle ABC is equilateral; and it has been constructed on the given finite straight line AB.

References

graph BT I_1[ I.1 ]:::post; %%%% I_1 dependencies I_post1( I.post.1 ):::post; click I_post1 "/elem.1.post.1" "Book I Postulate 1"; I_post3( I.post.3 ):::post click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15( I.def.15 ):::def click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; I_cn1( I.c.n.1 ):::cn click I_cn1 "/elem.1.c.n.1" "Book I Common Notion 1"; %%%% I_1 links I_1 --> I_post1 I_1 --> I_post3 I_1 --> I_def15 I_1 --> I_cn1

Footnotes


  1. On a given finite straight line
    The Greek usage differs from ours in that the definite article is employed in such a phrase as this where we have the indefinite. ἐπὶ τῆς δοθείσης εὐθείας πεπερασμένης, on the given finite straight line, i.e. the finite straight line which we choose to take. 

  2. Let AB be the given finite straight line.
    To be strictly literal we should have to translate in the reverse order let the given finite straight line be the (straight line) AB ; but this order is inconvenient in other cases where there is more than one datum, e.g. in the setting-out of I. 2, let the given point be A, and the given straight line BC, the awkwardness arising from the omission of the verb in the second clause. Hence I have, for clearness' sake, adopted the other order throughout the book. 

  3. let the circle BCD be described.
    Two things are here to be quoted,

    1. the elegant and practically universal use of the perfect passive imperative in constructions, γεγράφθω meaning of course let it have been described or suppose it described,
    2. the impossibility of expressing shortly in a translation the force of the words in their original order. κύκλος γεγράφθω ὸ ΒΓΔ means literally let a circle have been described, the (circle, namely, which I dequote by) BCD. Similarly we have lower down let straight lines, (namely) the (straight lines) CA, CB, be joined, ἐπεζεύχθωσαν εὐθεῖαι αί ΓΑ, ΓΒ. There seems to be no practicable alternative, in English, but to translate as I have done in the text.

  4. from the point C
    Euclid is careful to adhere to the phraseology of Postulate 1 except that he speaks of joining (ἐπεζεύχθωσαν) instead of drawing (γράφειν). He does not allow himself to use the shortened expression let the straight line FC be joined (without mention of the points F, C) until I. 5

  5. each of the straight lines CA, CB
    , ἑκατέρα τῶν ΓΑ, ΓΒ and 24. the three straight lines CA, AB, BC, αἱ τρεῖς αἱ ΓΑ, ΑΒ, ΒΓ. I have, here and in all similar expressions, inserted the words straight lines which are not in the Greek. The possession of the inflected definite article enables the Greek to omit the words, but this is not possible in English, and it would scarcely be English to write each of CA, CB or the three CA, AB, BC. 

Proposition I.2

Construct equal segments by extension

To place at a given point (as an extremity) a straight line equal to a given straight line.

Let A be the given point, and BC the given straight line.

Thus it is required to place at the point A (as an extremity)1 a straight line equal to the given straight line BC.

From the point A to the point B let the straight line AB be joined; I.post.1 and on it let the equilateral triangle DAB be constructed. I.1

Let the straight lines AE, BF be produced2 in a straight line with DA, DB; I.post.2 with centre B and distance BC let the circle CGH be described; I.post.3 and again, with centre D and distance DG let the circle GKL be described. I.post.3

Then, since the point B is the centre of the circle CGH,

Again, since the point D is the centre of the circle GKL,

And in these DA is equal to DB;

But BC was also proved equal to BG;

And things which are equal to the same thing are also equal to one another; I.c.n.1

Therefore at the given point A the straight line AL is placed equal to the given straight line BC.

References

graph BT I_2[ I.2 ]:::prop; click I_2 "/elem.1.2" "Book I Proposition 2"; %%%% I_2 dependencies I_1[ I.1 ]:::prop; click I_1 "/elem.1.1" "Book I Proposition 1"; I_post1( I.post.1 ):::post; click I_post1 "/elem.1.post.1" "Book I Postulate 1"; I_post2( I.post.2 ):::post; click I_post2 "/elem.1.post.2" "Book I Postulate 2"; I_post3( I.post.3 ):::post; click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15( I.def.15 ):::def; click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; %%%% I_2 links I_2 --> I_1 I_2 --> I_post1 I_2 --> I_post2 I_2 --> I_post3 I_2 --> I_def15 %%%% I_1 dependencies I_post1( I.post.1 ):::post; click I_post1 "/elem.1.post.1" "Book I Postulate 1"; I_post3( I.post.3 ):::post click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15( I.def.15 ):::def click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; I_cn1( I.c.n.1 ):::cn click I_cn1 "/elem.1.c.n.1" "Book I Common Notion 1"; %%%% I_1 links I_1 --> I_post1 I_1 --> I_post3 I_1 --> I_def15 I_1 --> I_cn1

Footnotes


  1. (as an extremity).
    I have inserted these words because to place a straight line at a given point (πρὸς τῷ δοθέντι σημείῳ) is not quite clear enough, at least in English. 

  2. Let the straight lines AE, BF be produced....
    It will be observed that in this first application of Postulate 2, and again in I. 5, Euclid speaks of the continuation of the straight line as that which is produced in such cases, ἐκβεβλήσθωσαν and προσεκβεβλήσθωσαν meaning little more than drawing straight lines in a straight line with the given straight lines. The first place in which Euclid uses phraseology exactly corresponding to ours when speaking of a straight line being produced is in I. 16: let one side of it, BC, be produced to D (προσεκβεβλήσθω αὐτοῦ μία πλευρὰ ἡ ΒΓ ἐπὶ τὸ Δ). 

  3. the remainder AL...the remainder BG.
    The Greek expressions are λοιπὴ ἡ ΑΛ and λοιπῇ τῇ BH, and the literal translation would be AL (or BG) remaining, but the shade of meaning conveyed by the position of the definite article can hardly be expressed in English. 

Proposition I.3

Construct equal segments by section

Given two unequal straight lines, to cut off from the greater a straight line equal to the less.

Let AB, C be the-two given unequal straight lines, and let AB be the greater of them.

Thus it is required to cut off from AB the greater a straight line equal to C the less.

At the point A let AD be placed equal to the straight line C; I.2 and with centre A and distance AD let the circle DEF be described. I.post.3

Now, since the point A is the centre of the circle DEF, AE is equal to AD. I.def.15 But C is also equal to AD.

Therefore, given the two straight lines AB, C, from AB the greater AE has been cut off equal to C the less.

References

graph BT I_3[ I.3 ]:::prop; click I_3 "/elem.1.3" "Book I Proposition 3"; %%%% dependencies I_2[ I.2 ]:::prop; click I_2 "/elem.1.2" "Book I Proposition 2"; I_post3( I.ax.3 ):::post; click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15( I.def.15 ):::def; click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; I_cn1( I.cn.1 ):::cn; click I_cn1 "/elem.1.c.n.1" "Book I Common Notion 1"; %%%% links I_3 --> I_2 I_3 --> I_post3 I_3 --> I_def15 I_3 --> I_cn1 %%%% I_2 dependencies I_1[ I.1 ]:::prop; click I_1 "/elem.1.1" "Book I Proposition 1"; I_post1( I.post.1 ):::post; click I_post1 "/elem.1.post.1" "Book I Postulate 1"; I_post2( I.post.2 ):::post; click I_post2 "/elem.1.post.2" "Book I Postulate 2"; I_post3( I.post.3 ):::post; click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15( I.def.15 ):::def; click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; %%%% I_2 links I_2 --> I_1 I_2 --> I_post1 I_2 --> I_post2 I_2 --> I_post3 I_2 --> I_def15 %%%% I_1 dependencies I_post1( I.post.1 ):::post; click I_post1 "/elem.1.post.1" "Book I Postulate 1"; I_post3( I.post.3 ):::post click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15( I.def.15 ):::def click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; I_cn1( I.c.n.1 ):::cn click I_cn1 "/elem.1.c.n.1" "Book I Common Notion 1"; %%%% I_1 links I_1 --> I_post1 I_1 --> I_post3 I_1 --> I_def15 I_1 --> I_cn1

Proposition I.4

Triangles with Equal Sides have equal angles

If two triangles have the two sides equal to two sides respectively, and have the angles contained by the equal straight lines equal, they will also have the base 1 equal to the base, the triangle will be equal to the triangle, and the remaining angles 2 will be equal to the remaining angles respectively, 3 namely those which the equal sides subtend. 4

Let ABC, DEF be two triangles having the two sides AB, AC equal to the two sides DE, DF respectively, namely AB to DE and AC to DF, and the angle BAC 5 equal to the angle EDF.

I say that the base BC is also equal to the base EF, the triangle ABC will be equal to the triangle DEF, and the remaining angles will be equal to the remaining angles respectively, namely those which the equal sides subtend, that is, the angle ABC to the angle DEF, and the angle ACB to the angle DFE.

For, if the triangle ABC be applied to the triangle DEF,

then the point B will also coincide 6 with E, because AB is equal to DE.

Again, AB coinciding with DE, the straight line AC will also coincide with DF, because the angle BAC is equal to the angle EDF;

But B also coincided with E; hence the base BC will coincide with the base EF.

[For if, when B coincides with E and C with F, the base BC does not coincide with the base EF, two straight lines will enclose a space: which is impossible.

Thus the whole triangle ABC will coincide with the whole triangle DEF,

And the remaining angles will also coincide with the remaining angles and will be equal to them, the angle ABC to the angle DEF, and the angle ACB to the angle DFE.

Therefore etc. 8

References

graph BT I_4[ I.4 ]:::prop; click I_4 "/elem.1.4" "Book I Proposition 4"; %%%% dependencies I_cn4( I.cn.4 ):::cn; click I_cn4 "/elem.1.c.n.4" "Book I Common Notion 4"; %%%% links I_4 --> I_cn4

Footnotes


  1. the base.
    Here we have the word base used for the first time in the Elements. Proclus explains it (p. 236, 12-15) as meaning (1), when no side of a triangle has been mentioned before, the side which is on a level with the sight (τὴν πρὸς τῇ ὄψει κειμένην), and (2), when two sides have already been mentioned, the third side. Proclus thus avoids the mistake made by some modern editors who explain the term exclusively with reference to the case where two sides have been mentioned before. That this is an error is proved (1) by the occurrence of the term in the enunciations of I. 37 etc. about triangles on the same base and equal bases, (2) by the application of the same term to the bases of parallelograms in I. 35 etc. The truth is that the use of the term must have been suggested by the practice of drawing the particular side horizontally, as it were, and the rest of the figure above it. The base of a figure was therefore spoken of, primarily, in the same sense as the base of anything else, e.g. of a pedestal or column; but when, as in I. 5, two triangles were compared occupying other than the normal positions which gave rise to the name, and when two sides had been previously mentioned, the base was, as Proclus says, necessarily the third side. 

  2. enunciation
    It is a fact that Euclid's enunciations not infrequently leave something to be desired in point of clearness and precision. Here he speaks of the triangles having the angle equal to the angle, namely the angle contained by the equal straight lines (τὴν γωνίαν τῇ γωνίᾳ ἴσην ἔχῃ τὴν ὑπὸ τῶν ἴσων εὐθειῶν περιεχομένην), only one of the two angles being described in the latter expression (in the accusative), and a similar expression in the dative being left to be understood of the other angle. It is curious too that, after mentioning two sides, he speaks of the angles contained by the equal straight lines, not sides.
    It may be that he wished to adhere scrupulously, at the outset, to the phraseology of the definitions, where the angle is the inclination to one another of two lines or straight lines. Similarly in the enunciation of [I. 5] he speaks of producing the equal straight lines as if to keep strictly to the wording of [Postulate 2

  3. respectively.
    I agree with Mr H. M. Taylor (Euclid, p. ix) that it is best to abandon the traditional translation of each to each,
    which would naturally seem to imply that all the four magnitudes are equal rather than (as the Greek ὲκατέρα ὲκατέρᾳ does) that one is equal to one and the other to the other. 

  4. subtend.

    ὑποτείνειν ὑπό

  5. the angle BAC.
    The full Greek expression would be ἡ ὑπὸ τῶν ΒΑ, ΑΓ περιεχομένη γωνία, the angle contained by the (straight lines) BA, AC.
    But it was a common practice of Greek geometers, e.g. of Archimedes and Apollonius (and Euclid too in Books X.—XIII.), to use the abbreviation αἱ ΒΑΓ for αἱ ΒΑ, ΑΓ, the (straight lines) BA, AC.
    Thus, on περιεχομένη being dropped, the expression would become first ἡ ὑπὸ τῶν ΒΑΓ γωνία, then ἡ ὑπὸ ΒΑΓ γωνία, and finally ἡ ὑπὸ ΒΑΓ, without γωνία, as we regularly find it in Euclid. 

  6. if the triangle be applied to...coincide.
    The difference between the technical use of the passive ἐφαρμόζεσθαι to be applied (to), and of the active ἐφαρμόζειν to coincide (with)
    has been noticed above (note on Common Notion 4, pp. 224-5). 

  7. [For if, when B coincides...36. coincide with EF].
    Heiberg (Paralipomena su Euklid in Hermes, XXXVIII., 1903, p. 56) has pointed out, as a conclusive reason for regarding these words as an early interpolation, that the text of an-Nairīzī (Codex Leidensis 399, 1, ed. Besthorn-Heiberg, p. 55) does not give the words in this place but after the conclusion Q.E.D., which shows that they constitute a scholium only. They were doubtless added by some commentator who thought it necessary to explain the immediate inference that, since B coincides with E and C with F, the straight line BC coincides with the straight line EF, an inference which really follows from the definition of a straight line and Post. 1; and no doubt the Postulate that Two straight lines cannot enclose a space (afterwards placed among the Common Notions) was interpolated at the same time. 

  8. Therefore etc.
    Where (as here) Euclid's conclusion merely repeats the enunciation word for word, I shall avoid the repetition and write Therefore etc.
    simply. 

Proposition I.5

The base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal

In isosceles triangles the angles at the base are equal to one another, and, if the equal straight 1 lines be produced further, the angles under the base will be equal to one another.

Let ABC be an isosceles triangle having the side AB equal to the side AC; and let the straight lines BD, CE be produced further in a straight line with AB, AC. I.post.2

I say that the angle ABC is equal to the angle ACB, and the angle CBD to the angle BCE.

Let a point F be taken at random on BD; 2 from AE the greater let AG be cut off equal to AF the less; I.3 and let the straight lines FC, GB be joined. I.post.1

Then, since AF is equal to AG and AB to AC,

and they contain a common angle, the angle FAG.

and the remaining angles will be equal to the remaining angles respectively, namely those which the equal sides subtend,

And, since the whole AF is equal to the whole AG,

But FC was also proved equal to GB; therefore the two sides BF, FC are equal to the two sides CG, GB respectively; and the angle BFC is equal to the angle CGB,

therefore the triangle BFC is also equal to the triangle CGB, and the remaining angles will be equal to the remaining angles respectively, namely those which the equal sides subtend;

Accordingly, since the whole angle ABG was proved equal to the angle ACF,

the remaining angle ABC is equal to the remaining angle ACB;

But the angle FBC was also proved equal to the angle GCB;

Therefore etc.

References

graph BT I_5[ I.5 ]:::prop; click I_5 "/elem.1.5" "Book I Proposition 5"; %%%% dependencies I_1[ I.1 ]:::prop; click I_1 "/elem.1.1" "Book I Proposition 1"; I_3[ I.3 ]:::prop; click I_3 "/elem.1.3" "Book I Proposition 3"; I_post1( I.post.1 ):::post; click I_post1 "/elem.1.post.1" "Book I Postulate 1"; I_post2( I.post.2 ):::post; click I_post2 "/elem.1.post.2" "Book I Postulate 2"; %%%% links I_5 --> I_1 I_5 --> I_3 I_5 --> I_post1 I_5 --> I_post2 %%%% I_3 dependencies I_2[ I.2 ]:::prop; click I_2 "/elem.1.2" "Book I Proposition 2"; I_post3( I.ax.3 ):::post; click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15( I.def.15 ):::def; click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; I_cn1( I.cn.1 ):::cn; click I_cn1 "/elem.1.c.n.1" "Book I Common Notion 1"; %%%% I_3 links I_3 --> I_2 I_3 --> I_post3 I_3 --> I_def15 I_3 --> I_cn1 %%%% I_2 dependencies I_1[ I.1 ]:::prop; click I_1 "/elem.1.1" "Book I Proposition 1"; I_post1( I.post.1 ):::post; click I_post1 "/elem.1.post.1" "Book I Postulate 1"; I_post2( I.post.2 ):::post; click I_post2 "/elem.1.post.2" "Book I Postulate 2"; I_post3( I.post.3 ):::post; click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15( I.def.15 ):::def; click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; %%%% I_2 links I_2 --> I_1 I_2 --> I_post1 I_2 --> I_post2 I_2 --> I_post3 I_2 --> I_def15 %%%% I_1 dependencies I_post1( I.post.1 ):::post; click I_post1 "/elem.1.post.1" "Book I Postulate 1"; I_post3( I.post.3 ):::post click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15( I.def.15 ):::def click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; I_cn1( I.c.n.1 ):::cn click I_cn1 "/elem.1.c.n.1" "Book I Common Notion 1"; %%%% I_1 links I_1 --> I_post1 I_1 --> I_post3 I_1 --> I_def15 I_1 --> I_cn1

Footnotes


  1. the equal straight lines
    (meaning the equal sides). Cf. note on the similar expression in Prop. 4, lines 2, 3. 

  2. Let a point F be taken at random on BD
    , εἰλήφθω ἐπὶ τῆς ΒΔ τυχὸν σημεῖον τὸ Ζ, where τυχὸν σημεῖονmeans a chance point. 

  3. the two sides FA, AC are equal to the two sides GA, AB respectively,

    δύο αἱ ΖΑ, ΑΓ δυσὶ ταῖς ΗΑ, ΑΒ ἴσαι εἰσὶν ἑκατέρα ἑκατέρᾳ

  4. the base BC is common to them,
    i.e., apparently, common to the angles, as the αὐτῶν in βάσις αὐτῶν κοινὴ can only refer to γωνία and γωνίᾳ preceding. Simson wrote and the base BC is common to the two triangles BFC, CGB ; Todhunter left out these words as being of no use and tending to perplex a beginner. But Euclid evidently chose to quote the conclusion of I. 4 exactly; the first phrase of that conclusion is that the bases (of the two triangles) are equal, and, as the equal bases are here the same base, Euclid naturally substitutes the word common for equal. 

  5. Q.E.D.
    As (Being) what it was required to prove (or do) is somewhat long, I shall henceforth write the time-honoured Q. E. D. and Q. E. F. for ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι and ὅπερ ἔδει ποιῆσαι

Proposition I.6

If in a triangle two angles be equal to one another, the sides which subtend the equal angles will also be equal to one another.

Let ABC be a triangle having the angle ABC equal to the angle ACB;

I say that the side AB is also equal to the side AC.

For, if AB is unequal to AC, one of them is greater.

Let AB be greater; and from AB the greater let DB be cut off equal to AC the less;

let DC be joined.

Then, since DB is equal to AC, and BC is common,

and the angle DBC is equal to the angle ACB;

Therefore etc.

Proposition I.7

Given two straight lines constructed on a straight line (from its extremities) and meeting in a point, there cannot be constructed on the same straight line (from its extremities), and on the same side of it, two other straight lines meeting in another point and equal to the former two respectively, namely each to that which has the same extremity with it.

For, if possible, given two straight lines AC, CB constructed on the straight line AB and meeting at the point C, let two other straight lines AD, DB be constructed on the same straight line AB, on the same side of it, meeting in another point D and equal to the former two respectively, namely each to that which has the same extremity with it, so that CA is equal to DA which has the same extremity A with it, and CB to DB which has the same extremity B with it; and let CD be joined.

Then, since AC is equal to AD,

therefore the angle CDB is much greater than the angle DCB. 2

Again, since CB is equal to DB,

But it was also proved much greater than it:

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. equal to the angle
    It would be natural to insert here the step but the angle ACD is greater than the angle BCD. [C.N. 5]. 

  2. much greater
    literally greater by much (πολλῷ μεἰζων). Simson and those who follow him translate: much more then is the angle BDC greater than the angle BCD, but the Greek for this would have to be πολλῷ (or πολὺ[ρπαρ ] μᾶλλόν ἐστι...μείζων. πολλῷ μᾶλλον, however, though used by Apollonius, is not, apparently, found in Euclid or Archimedes. 

Proposition I.8

If two triangles have the two sides equal to two sides respectively, and have also the base equal to the base, they will also have the angles equal which are contained by the equal straight lines.

Let ABC, DEF be two triangles having the two sides AB, AC equal to the two sides DE, DF respectively, namely AB to DE, and AC to DF; and let them have the base BC equal to the base EF;

I say that the angle BAC is also equal to the angle EDF.

For, if the triangle ABC be applied to the triangle DEF, and if the point B be placed on the point E and the straight line BC on EF,

Then, BC coinciding with EF,

for, if the base BC coincides with the base EF, and the sides BA, AC do not coincide with ED, DF but fall beside them 2 as EG, GF,

Therefore it is not possible that, if the base BC be applied to the base EF, the sides BA, AC should not coincide with ED, DF;

so that the angle BAC will also coincide with the angle EDF, and will be equal to it.

If therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. BA, AC.
    The text has here BA, CA. 

  2. fall beside them
    The Greek has the future, παραλλάξουσι. παραλλάττω means to pass by without touching, to miss or to deviate. 

Proposition I.9

To bisect a given rectilineal angle.

Let the angle BAC be the given rectilineal angle.

Thus it is required to bisect it.

Let a point D be taken at random on AB; let AE be cut off from AC equal to AD; I.3 let DE be joined, and on DE let the equilateral triangle DEF be constructed; let AF be joined.

I say that the angle BAC has been bisected by the straight line AF.

For, since AD is equal to AE, and AF is common,

And the base DF is equal to the base EF;

Therefore the given rectilineal angle BAC has been bisected by the straight line AF.

References

Proposition I.10

To bisect a given finite straight line.

Let AB be the given finite straight line.

Thus it is required to bisect the finite straight line AB.

Let the equilateral triangle ABC be constructed on it, I.1 and let the angle ACB be bisected by the straight line CD; I.9

I say that the straight line AB has been bisected at the point D.

For, since AC is equal to CB, and CD is common,

and the angle ACD is equal to the angle BCD;

Therefore the given finite straight line AB has been bisected at D.

References

Proposition I.11

To draw a straight line at right angles to a given straight line from a given point on it.

Let AB be the given straight line, and C the given point on it.

Thus it is required to draw from the point C a straight line at right angles to the straight line AB.

Let a point D be taken at random on AC; 1 let CE be made equal to CD; I.3 on DE let the equilateral triangle FDE be constructed, I.1 and let FC be joined;

I say that the straight line FC has been drawn at right angles to the given straight line AB from C the given point on it.

For, since DC is equal to CE, and CF is common,

and the base DF is equal to the base FE;

But, when a straight line set up on a straight line makes the adjacent angles equal to one another, each of the equal angles is right; I.def.10

Therefore the straight line CF has been drawn at right angles to the given straight line AB from the given point C on it.

References

graph BT I_11[ I.11 ]:::prop; click I_11 "/elem.1.11" "Book I Proposition 11"; %%%% dependencies I_def10[ I.def.10 ]:::def; click I_def10 "/elem.1.def.10" "Book I Definition 10"; I_1[ I.1 ]:::prop; click I_1 "/elem.1.1" "Book I Proposition 1"; I_3[ I.3 ]:::prop; click I_3 "/elem.1.3" "Book I Proposition 3"; I_8[ I.8 ]:::def; click I_8 "/elem.1.8" "Book I Proposition 8"; %%%% links I_11 --> I_def10 I_11 --> I_1 I_11 --> I_3 I_11 --> I_8 %%%% I_3 dependencies I_2[ I.2 ]:::prop; click I_2 "/elem.1.2" "Book I Proposition 2"; I_post3[ I.ax.3 ]:::post; click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15[ I.def.15 ]:::def; click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; I_cn1[ I.cn.1 ]:::cn; click I_cn1 "/elem.1.c.n.1" "Book I Common Notion 1"; %%%% links I_3 --> I_2 I_3 --> I_post3 I_3 --> I_def15 I_3 --> I_cn1 %%%% dependencies I_1[ I.1 ]:::prop; click I_1 "/elem.1.1" "Book I Proposition 1"; I_post1[ 1.post.1 ]:::post; click I_post1 "/elem.1.post.1" "Book I Postulate 1"; I_post2[ 1.post.2 ]:::post; click I_post2 "/elem.1.post.2" "Book I Postulate 2"; I_post3[ 1.post.3 ]:::post; click I_post3 "/elem.1.post.3" "Book I Postulate 3"; I_def15[ 1.def.15 ]:::def; click I_def15 "/elem.1.def.15" "Book I Definition 15"; %%%% links I_2 --> I_1 I_2 --> I_post1 I_2 --> I_post2 I_2 --> I_post3 I_2 --> I_def15

Footnotes


  1. let CE be made equal to CD.
    The verb is κείσθω which, as well as the other parts of κεῖμαι, is constantly used for the passive of τίθημι to place ; and the latter word is constantly used in the sense of making, e.g., one straight line equal to another straight line. 

Proposition I.12

To a given infinite straight line, from a given point which is not on it, to draw a perpendicular straight line.1

Let AB be the given infinite straight line, and C the given point which is not on it; thus it is required to draw to the given infinite straight line AB, from the given point C which is not on it, a perpendicular straight line.

For let a point D be taken at random on the other side of the straight line AB2, and with centre C and distance CD let the circle EFG be described; I.post.3

I say that CH has been drawn perpendicular to the given infinite straight line AB from the given point C which is not on it.

For, since GH is equal to HE, and HC is common,

and the base CG is equal to the base CE;

But, when a straight line set up on a straight line makes the adjacent angles equal to one another, each of the equal angles is right, and the straight line standing on the other is called a perpendicular to that on which it stands. I.def.10

Therefore CH has been drawn perpendicular to the given infinite straight line AB from the given point C which is not on it.

References

Footnotes


  1. a perpendicular straight line
    , κάθετον εὐθεῖαν γραμμἡν. This is the full expression for a perpendicular, κάθετος meaning let fall or let down, so that the expression corresponds to our plumb-line. ἡ κάθετος is however constantly used alone for a perpendicular, γραμμἡ being understood. 

  2. on the other side of the straight line AB
    , literally towards the other parts of the straight line AB, ἐπὶ τὰ ἕτερα μέρη τῆς AB. Cf. on the same side (ἐπὶ τὰ αὐτὰ μέρη) in Post. 5 and in both directions (ἐφ̓ ἑκάτερα τὰ μἑρη) in Def. 23

Proposition I.13

If a straight line set up on a straight line make angles, it will make either two right angles or angles equal to two right angles.

For let any straight line AB set up on the straight line CD make the angles CBA, ABD;

I say that the angles CBA, ABD are either two right angles or equal to two right angles.

Now, if the angle CBA is equal to the angle ABD,

But, if not, let BE be drawn from the point B at right angles to CD; [I. 11]

Then, since the angle CBE is equal to the two angles CBA, ABE,

Again, since the angle DBA is equal to the two angles DBE, EBA,

But the angles CBE, EBD were also proved equal to the same three angles;

But the angles CBE, EBD are two right angles;

Therefore etc.


  1. let the angle EBD be added to each,
    literally let the angle EBD be added (so as to be) common, κοινὴ προσκείσθω ἡ ὑπὸ ΕΒΔ. Similarly κοινὴ ἀφηρήσθω is used of subtracting a straight line or angle from each of two others. Let the common angle EBD be added is clearly an inaccurate translation, for the angle is not common before it is added, i.e. the κοινὴ is proleptic. Let the common angle be subtracted as a translation of κοινὴ ἀφηρήσθω would be less unsatisfactory, it is true, but, as it is desirable to use corresponding words when translating the two expressions, it seems hopeless to attempt to keep the word common, and I have therefore said to each and from each simply. 

Proposition I.14

If with any straight line, and at a point on it, two straight lines not lying on the same side make the adjacent angles equal to two right angles, the two straight lines will be in a straight line with one another. 1

For with any straight line AB, and at the point B on it, let the two straight lines BC, BD not lying on the same side make the adjacent angles ABC, ABD equal to two right angles;

I say that BD is in a straight line with CB.

For, if BD is not in a straight line with BC, let BE be in a straight line with CB.

Then, since the straight line AB stands on the straight line CBE,

But the angles ABC, ABD are also equal to two right angles;

Let the angle CBA be subtracted from each; therefore the remaining angle ABE is equal to the remaining angle ABD, [C.N. 3]

Similarly we can prove 3 that neither is any other straight line except BD.

Therefore etc.


  1. If with any straight line....
    There is no greater difficulty in translating the works of the Greek geometers than that of accurately giving the force of prepositions. πρός, for instance, is used in all sorts of expressions with various shades of meaning. The present enunciation begins ἐὰν πρός τινι εὐθείᾳ καὶ τῷ πρὸς αὐτῆ σημείῳ, and it is really necessary in this one sentence to translate πρός by three different words, with, at, and on. The first πρός must be translated by with because two straight lines make an angle with one another. On the other hand, where the similar expression πρὸς τῇ δοθείση εὐθείᾳ occurs in I. 23, but it is a question of constructing an angle (συστἡσασθαι), we have to say to construct on a given straight line. Against would perhaps be the English word coming nearest to expressing all these meanings of πρός, but it would be intolerable as a translation. 

  2. equal to the angles
    Todhunter points out that for the inference in this line Post. 4, that all right angles are equal, is necessary as well as the Common Notion that things which are equal to the same thing (or rather, here, to equal things) are equal. A similar remark applies to steps in the proofs of I. 15 and I. 28

  3. we can prove.
    The Greek expresses this by the future of the verb, δείξομεν, we shall prove, which however would perhaps be misleading in English. 

Proposition I.15

If two straight lines cut one another, they make the vertical angles 1 equal to one another.

For let the straight lines AB, CD cut one another at the point E;

I say that the angle AEC is equal to the angle DEB,

For, since the straight line AE stands on the straight line CD, making the angles CEA, AED,

Again, since the straight line DE stands on the straight line AB, making the angles AED, DEB,

But the angles CEA, AED were also proved equal to two right angles;

Similarly it can be proved that the angles CEB, DEA are also equal.

Therefore etc.

Porism

[From this it is manifest that, if two straight lines cut one another, they will make the angles at the point of section 2 equal to four right angles.

References

Footnotes


  1. the vertical angles.
    The difference between adjacent angles (αἱ ἐφεξῆς γωνίαι) and vertical angles (αἱ κατὰ κορυφὴν γωνίαι) is thus explained by Proclus (p. 298, 14-24). The first term describes the angles made by two straight lines when one only is divded by the other, i.e. when one straight line meets another at a point which is not either of its extremities, but is not itself produced beyond the point of meeting. When the first straight line is produced, so that the lines cross at the point, they make two pairs of vertical angles (which are more clearly described as vertically opposite angles), and which are so called because their convergence is from opposite directions to one point (the intersection of the lines) as vertex (κορυφή). 

  2. at the point of section,
    literally at the section, πρὸς τῇ τομῆ

Proposition I.16

In any triangle, if one of the sides be produced, the exterior angle is greater than either of the interior and opposite angles.

Let ABC be a triangle, and let one side of it BC be produced to D;

I say that the exterior angle 1 ACDis greater than either of the interior and opposite angles 2 CBA, BAC.

Let AC be bisected at E I.10, and let BE be joined and produced in a straight line to F;

let EF be made equal to BEI.3, let FC be joined I.post.1, and let AC be drawn through to G 3 I.post.2.

Then, since AE is equal to EC, and BE to EF,

But the angle ECD is greater than the angle ECF; I.c.n.5

Similarly also, if BC be bisected, the angle BCG, that is, the angle ACD I.15, can be proved greater than the angle ABC as well.

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. the exterior angle,
    literally the outside angle, ἡ ἐκτὸς γωνία

  2. the interior and opposite angles,

    τῶν ἐντὸς καὶ ἀπεναντίον γωνιῶν

  3. let AC be drawn through to G.
    The word is διήχθω, a variation on the more usual ἐκβεβλήσθω, let it be produced. 

  4. CFE,
    in the text FEC. 

Proposition I.17

In any triangle two angles taken together in any manner 1 are less than two right angles.

Let ABC be a triangle; I say that two angles of the triangle ABC taken together in any manner are less than two right angles.

For let BC be produced to D. I.post.2

Then, since the angle ACD is an exterior angle of the triangle ABC,

it is greater than the interior and opposite angle ABC. I.16

therefore the angles ACD, ACB are greater than the angles ABC, BCA. But the angles ACD, ACB are equal to two right angles. I.13

Therefore the angles ABC, BCA are less than two right angles.

Similarly we can prove that the angles BAC, ACB are also less than two right angles, and so are the angles CAB, ABC as well.

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. taken together in any manner,

    πάντη μεταλαμβανόμεναι

Proposition I.18

In any triangle the greater side subtends the greater angle.

For let ABC be a triangle having the side AC greater than AB;

I say that the angle ABC is also greater than the angle BCA.

For, since AC is greater than AB, let AD be made equal to AB I.3, and let BD bejoined.

Then, since the angle ADB is an exterior angle of the triangle BCD,

it is greater than the interior and opposite angle DCB. I.16

But the angle ADB is equal to the angle ABD,

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. Number
    In the enunciation of this number we have ὑποτείνειν (subtend) used with the simple accusative instead of the more usual ὑπό with accusative. The latter construction is used in the enunciation of I. 19, which otherwise only differs from that of I. 18 in the order of the words. The point to remember in order to distinguish the two is that the datum comes first and the quaesitum second, the datum being in this proposition the greater side and in the next the greater angle. Thus the enunciations are (I. 18) παντὸς τριγώνου ἡ μείζων πλευρὰ τὴν μείζονα γωνίαν ὑποτείνει and (I. 19) παντὸς τριγώνου ὑπὸ τὴν μείζονα γωνίαν ἡ μείζων πλευρὰ ὑποτείνει. In order to keep the proper order in English we must use the passive of the verb in I. 19. Aristotle quotes the result of I. 19, using the exact wording, ὑπὸ γὰρ τὴν μείζω γωνίαν ὑποτείνει (Meteorologica III. 5, 376 a 12). 

Proposition I.19

In any triangle the greater angle is subtended by the greater side.

Let ABC be a triangle having the angle ABC greater than the angle BCA;

I say that the side AC is also greater than the side AB.

For, if not, AC is either equal to AB or less.

Now AC is not equal to AB; for then the angle ABC would also have been equal to the angle ACB; I.5 but it is not;

Neither is AC less than AB, for then the angle ABC would also have been less than the angle ACB; I.18 but it is not;

And it was proved that it is not equal either.

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes

Proposition I.20

In any triangle two sides taken together in any manner are greater than the remaining one. 1

For let ABC be a triangle; I say that in the triangle ABC two sides taken together in any manner are greater than the remaining one, namely

For let BA be drawn through to the point D, let DA be made equal to CA, and let DC be joined.

Then, since DA is equal to AC, the angle ADC is also equal to the angle ACD; I.5

And, since DCB is a triangle having the angle BCD greater than the angle BDC,

But DA is equal to AC;

Similarly we can prove that AB, BC are also greater than CA, and BC, CA than AB.

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. note
    It was the habit of the Epicureans, says Proclus (p. 322), to ridicule this theorem as being evident even to an ass and requiring no proof, and their allegation that the theorem was known (γνώριμον) even to an ass was based on the fact that, if fodder is placed at one angular point and the ass at another, he does not, in order to get to his food, traverse the two sides of the triangle but only the one side separating them (an argument which makes Savile exclaim that its authors were digni ipsi, qui cum Asino foenum essent, p. 78). Proclus replies truly that a mere perception of the truth of the theorem is a different thing from a scientific proof of it and a knowledge of the reason why it is true. Moreover, as Simson says, the number of axioms should not be increased without necessity. 

Proposition I.21

If on one of the sides of a triangle, from its extremities, there be constructed two straight lines meeting within the triangle,1 the straight lines so constructed 2 will be less than the remaining two sides of the triangle, but will contain a greater angle.

On BC, one of the sides of the triangle ABC, from its extremities B, C, let the two straight lines BD, DC be constructed meeting within the triangle;

I say that BD, DC are less than the remaining two sides of the triangle BA, AC, but contain an angle BDC greater than the angle BAC.

For let BD be drawn through to E.

Then, since in any triangle two sides are greater than the remaining one, I.20

Let EC be added to each;

Again, since, in the triangle CED,

But BA, AC were proved greater than BE, EC;

Again, since in any triangle the exterior angle is greater than the interior and opposite angle, I.16 therefore, in the triangle CDE,

For the same reason, moreover, in the triangle ABE also,

But the angle BDC was proved greater than the angle CEB;

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. be constructed...meeting within the triangle.
    The word meeting is not in the Greek, where the words are ἐντὸς συσταθῶσιν. συνίστασθαι is the word used of constructing two straight lines to a point (cf. I. 7) or so as to form a triangle; but it is necessary in English to indicate that they meet

  2. the straight lines so constructed.
    Observe the elegant brevity of the Greek αἱ συσταθεῖσαι

Proposition I.22

Out of three straight lines, which are equal to three given straight lines, to construct a triangle: thus it is necessary 1 that two of the straight lines taken together in any manner should be greater than the remaining one. [I.20] 2 3

Let the three given straight lines be A, B, C, and of these let two taken together in any manner be greater than the remaining one, namely A, B greater than C,

nd B, C greater than A; thus it is required to construct a triangle out of straight lines equal to A, B, C.

Let there be set out a straight line DE, terminated at D but of infinite length in the direction of E, and let DF be made equal to A, FG equal to B, and GH equal to C. I.3

With centre F and distance FD let the circle DKL be described; again, with centre G and distance GH let the circle KLH be described; and let KF, KG be joined;

I say that the triangle KFG has been constructed out of three straight lines equal to A, B, C.

For, since the point F is the centre of the circle DKL,

But FD is equal to A;

Again, since the point G is the centre of the circle LKH,

But GH is equal to C;

therefore the three straight lines KF, FG, GK are equal to the three straight lines A, B, C.

Therefore out of the three straight lines KF, FG, GK, which are equal to the three given straight lines A, B, C, the triangle KFG has been constructed.

References

Footnotes


  1. thus it is necessary.
    This is usually translated (e.g. by Williamson and Simson) But it is necessary, which is however inaccurate, since the Greek is not δεῖ δέ but δεῖ δή. The words are the same as those used to introduce the διορισμός in the other sense of the definition or particular statement of a construction to be effected. Hence, as in the latter case we say thus it is required (e.g. to bisect the finite straight line AB, I. 10), we should here translate thus it is necessary. 

  2. enunciation note
    This is the first case in the Elements of a διορισμός to a problem in the sense of a statement of the conditions or limits of the possibility of a solution. The criterion is of course supplied by the preceding proposition. 

  3. enunciation note
    To this enunciation all the MSS. and Boethius add, after the διορισμός, the words because in any triangle two sides taken together in any manner are greater than the remaining one.
    But this explanation has the appearance of a gloss, and it is omitted by Proclus and Campanus. Moreover there is no corresponding addition to the διορισμός of VI. 28

Proposition I.23

On a given straight line and at a point on it to construct a rectilineal angle equal to a given rectilineal angle.

Let AB be the given straight line, A the point on it, and the angle DCE the given rectilineal angle;

thus it is required to construct on the given straight line AB, and at the point A on it, a rectilineal angle equal to the given rectilineal angle DCE.

On the straight lines CD, CE respectively let the points D, E be taken at random; let DE be joined, and out of three straight lines which are equal to the three straight lines CD, DE, CE let the triangle AFG be constructed in such a way that CD is equal to AF, CE to AG, and further DE to FG.

Then, since the two sides DC, CE are equal to the two sides FA, AG respectively,

Therefore on the given straight line AB, and at the point A on it, the rectilineal angle FAG has been constructed equal to the given rectilineal angle DCE.

References

Proposition I.24

If two triangles have the two sides equal to two sides respectively, but have the one of the angles contained by the equal straight lines greater than the other, they will also have the base greater than the base.

Let ABC, DEF be two triangles having the two sides AB, AC equal to the two sides DE, DF respectively, namely AB to DE, and AC to DF, and let the angle at A be greater than the angle at D;

I say that the base BC is also greater than the base EF. 1

For, since the angle BAC is greater than the angle EDF, let there be constructed, on the straight line DE, and at the point D on it, the angle EDG equal to the angle BAC; I.23 let DG be made equal to either of the two straight lines AC, DF, and let EG, FG be joined.

Then, since AB is equal to DE, and AC to DG, the two sides BA, AC are equal to the two sides ED, DG, respectively;

Again, since DF is equal to DG,

Therefore the angle EFG is much greater than the angle EGF.

And, since EFG is a triangle having the angle EFG greater than the angle EGF,

But EG is equal to BC.

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. I say that the base BC is also greater than the base EF.
    I have naturally left out the well-known words added by Simson in order to avoid the necessity of considering three cases: Of the two sides DE, DF let DE be the side which is not greater than the other.
    I doubt whether Euclid could have been induced to insert the words himself, even if it had been represented to him that their omission meant leaving two possible cases out of consideration. His habit and that of the great Greek geometers was, not to set out all possible cases, but to give as a rule one case, generally the most difficult, as here, and to leave the others to the reader to work out for himself. We have already seen one instance in I. 7

Proposition I.25

If two triangles have the two sides equal to two sides respectively, but have the base greater than the base, they will also have the one of the angles contained by the equal straight lines greater than the other.

Let ABC, DEF be two triangles having the two sides AB, AC equal to the two sides DE, DF respectively, namely AB to DE, and AC to DF; and let the base BC be greater than the base EF;

I say that the angle BAC is also greater than the angle EDF.

For, if not, it is either equal to it or less.

Now the angle BAC is not equal to the angle EDF; for then the base BC would also have been equal to the base EF, I.4

Neither again is the angle BAC less than the angle EDF; for then the base BC would also have been less than the base EF, I.24

But it was proved that it is not equal either;

Therefore etc.

References

Proposition I.26

If two triangles have the two angles equal to two angles respectively, and one side equal to one side, namely, either the side adjoining the equal angles, 1 or that subtending one of the equal angles, they will also have the remaining sides equal to the remaining sides and the remaining angle to the remaining angle.

Let ABC, DEF be two triangles having the two angles ABC, BCA equal to the two angles DEF, EFD respectively, namely the angle ABC to the angle DEF, and the angle BCA to the angle EFD; and let them also have one side equal to one side, first that adjoining the equal angles, namely BC to EF;

I say that they will also have the remaining sides equal to the remaining sides respectively, namely AB to DE and AC to DF, and the remaining angle to the remaining angle, namely the angle BAC to the angle EDF.

For, if AB is unequal to DE, one of them is greater.

Let AB be greater, and let BG be made equal to DE; and let GC be joined.

Then, since BG is equal to DE, and BC to EF, the two sides GB, BC are equal to the two sides DE, EF respectively; and the angle GBC is equal to the angle DEF;

But the angle DFE is by hypothesis equal to the angle BCA; 2

But BC is also equal to EF;

Again, let sides subtending equal angles be equal, as AB to DE;

I say again that the remaining sides will be equal to the remaining sides, namely AC to DF and BC to EF, and further the remaining angle BAC is equal to the remaining angle EDF.

For, if BC is unequal to EF, one of them is greater.

Let BC be greater, if possible, and let BH be made equal to EF; let AH be joined.

Then, since BH is equal to EF, and AB to DE, the two sides AB, BH are equal to the two sides DE, EF respectively, and they contain equal angles;

and the triangle ABH is equal to the triangle DEF, and the remaining angles will be equal to the remaining angles, namely those which the equal sides subtend; I.4

But the angle EFD is equal to the angle BCA; therefore, in the triangle AHC, the exterior angle BHA is equal to the interior and opposite angle BCA:

Therefore BC is not unequal to EF,

But AB is also equal to DE; therefore the two sides AB, BC are equal to the two sides DE, EF respectively, and they contain equal angles;

and the remaining angle BAC equal to the remaining angle EDF. I.4

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. the side adjoining the equal angles,

    πλευρὰν τὴν πρὸς ταῖς ἴσαις γωνίαις

  2. is by hypothesis equal.

    ὑπόκειται ἴση

Proposition I.27

If a straight line falling on two straight lines 1 make the alternate angles [^I.27:2] equal to one another, the straight lines will be parallel to one another.

For let the straight line EF falling on the two straight lines AB, CD make the alternate angles AEF, EFD equal to one another;

I say that AB is parallel to CD.

For, if not, AB, CD when produced will meet either in the direction of B, D or towards A, C. [^I.27:3]

Let them be produced and meet, in the direction of B, D, at G.

Then, in the triangle GEF, the exterior angle AEF is equal to the interior and opposite angle EFG: which is impossible. I.16

Therefore AB, CD when produced will not meet in the direction of B, D.

Similarly it can be proved that neither will they meet towards A, C.

But straight lines which do not meet in either direction are parallel; I.def.23

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes

[^I.27:2] the alternate angles,

αἱ ἐναλλὰξ γωνίαι

  1. falling on two straight lines,

    εὶς δύο εὐθείας ἐμπίπτουσα

Proposition I.28

If a straight line falling on two straight lines make the exterior angle equal to the interior and opposite angle on the same side, or the interior angles on the same side equal to two right angles, the straight lines will be parallel to one another.

For let the straight line EF falling on the two straight lines AB, CD make the exterior angle EGB equal to the interior and opposite angle GHD, or the interior angles on the same side, namely BGH, GHD, equal to two right angles;

I say that AB is parallel to CD.

For, since the angle EGB is equal to the angle GHD, while the angle EGB is equal to the angle AGH, I.15 the angle AGH is also equal to the angle GHD; and they are alternate;

Again, since the angles BGH, GHD are equal to two right angles, and the angles AGH, BGH are also equal to two right angles, I.13 the angles AGH, BGH are equal to the angles BGH, GHD.

Let the angle BGH be subtracted from each; therefore the remaining angle AGH is equal to the remaining angle GHD; and they are alternate;

Therefore etc.

References

Proposition I.29

A straight line falling on parallel straight lines makes the alternate angles equal to one another, the exterior angle equal to the interior and opposite angle, and the interior angles on the same side equal to two right angles.

For let the straight line EF fall on the parallel straight lines AB, CD;

I say that it makes the alternate angles AGH, GHD equal, the exterior angle EGB equal to the interior and opposite angle GHD, and the interior angles on the same side, namely BGH, GHD, equal to two right angles.

For, if the angle AGH is unequal to the angle GHD, one of them is greater.

Let the angle AGH be greater.

Let the angle BGH be added to each; therefore the angles AGH, BGH are greater than the angles BGH, GHD.

But the angles AGH, BGH are equal to two right angles; I.13

But straight lines produced indefinitely from angles less than two right angles meet; [I.post.5] 1

Therefore the angle AGH is not unequal to the angle GHD,

Again, the angle AGH is equal to the angle EGB; I.15

Let the angle BGH be added to each;

But the angles EGB, BGH are equal to two right angles; I.13

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. straight lines produced indefinitely from angles less than two right angles,

    αἰ δὲ ἀπ: ὲλασσόνων ἢ δύο ὀρθῶν ἐκβαλλόμεναι εἰς ἄπειπον συμπίπτουσιν

  2. because they are by hypothesis parallel,
    literally because they are supposed parallel, διὰ τὸ παραλλήλους αὐτὰς ὑποκεῖσθαι

Proposition I.30

Straight lines parallel to the same straight line are also parallel to one another.

Let each of the straight lines AB, CD be parallel to EF; I say that AB is also parallel to CD.

For let the straight line GK fall upon them;

Then, since the straight line GK has fallen on the parallel straight lines AB, EF,

Again, since the straight line GK has fallen on the parallel straight lines EF, CD,

But the angle AGK was also proved equal to the angle GHF;

and they are alternate.

Therefore AB is parallel to CD. 1

References

Footnotes


  1. Therefore...
    The usual conclusion in general terms (Therefore etc.) repeating the enunciation is, curiously enough, wanting at the end of this proposition. 

Proposition I.31

Through a given point to draw a straight line parallel to a given straight line.

Let A be the given point, and BC the given straight line; thus it is required to draw through the point A a straight line parallel to the straight line BC.

Let a point D be taken at random on BC, and let AD be joined; on the straight line DA, and at the point A on it, let the angle DAE be constructed equal to the angle ADC I.23; and let the straight line AF be produced in a straight line with EA.

Then, since the straight line AD falling on the two straight lines BC, EF has made the alternate angles EAD, ADC equal to one another,

Therefore through the given point A the straight line EAF has been drawn parallel to the given straight line BC.

References

Proposition I.32

In any triangle, if one of the sides be produced, the exterior angle is equal to the two interior and opposite angles, and the three interior angles of the triangle are equal to two right angles.

Let ABC be a triangle, and let one side of it BC be produced to D;

I say that the exterior angle ACD is equal to the two interior and opposite angles CAB, ABC, and the three interior angles of the triangle ABC, BCA, CAB are equal to two right angles.

For let CE be drawn through the point C parallel to the straight line AB. I.31

Then, since AB is parallel to CE,

Again, since AB is parallel to CE,

the exterior angle ECD is equal to the interior and opposite angle ABC. I.29

But the angle ACE was also proved equal to the angle BAC;

Let the angle ACB be added to each;

But the angles ACD, ACB are equal to two right angles; I.13

Therefore etc.

References

Proposition I.33

The straight lines joining equal and parallel straight lines (at the extremities which are) in the same directions (respectively) [^I.33:1] are themselves also equal and parallel.

Let AB, CD be equal and parallel, and let the straight lines AC, BD join them (at the extremities which are) in the same directions (respectively); I say that AC, BD are also equal and parallel.

Let BC be joined.

Then, since AB is parallel to CD, and BC has fallen upon them,

And, since AB is equal to CD,

And, since the straight line BC falling on the two straight lines AC, BD has made the alternate angles equal to one another,

And it was also proved equal to it.

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes

[^I.33:1]. joining...(at the extremities which are) in the same directions (respectively).
I have for clearness' sake inserted the words in brackets though they are not in the original Greek, which has joining...in the same directions or on the same sides, ἐπὶ τὰ αυτὰ μέρη ἐπιζευγνύουσαι. The expression tiwards the same parts, though usage has sanctioned it, is perhaps not quite satisfactory.


  1. DC, CB
    and 18. DCB. The Greek has BC, CD and BCD in these places respectively. Euclid is not always careful to write in corresponding order the letters denoting corresponding points in congruent figures. On the contrary, he evidently prefers the alphabetical order, and seems to disdain to alter it for the sake of beginners or others who might be confused by it. In the case of angles alteration is perhaps unnecessary; but in the case of triangles and pairs of corresponding sides I have ventured to alter the order to that which the mathematician of to-day expects. 

Proposition I.34

In parallelogrammic areasi 1 the opposite sides and angles are equal to one another, and the diameter bisects the areas.

Let ACDB be a parallelogrammic area, and BC its diameter; I say that the opposite sides and angles of the parallelogram ACDB are equal to one another, and the diameter BC bisects it.

For, since AB is parallel to CD, and the straight line BC has fallen upon them,

Again, since AC is parallel to BD, and BC has fallen upon them,

Therefore ABC, DCB2 are two triangles having the two angles ABC, BCA equal to the two angles DCB, CBD respectively, and one side equal to one side, namely that adjoining the equal angles and common to both of them, BC;

and further the angle BAC is equal to the angle CDB.

And, since the angle ABC is equal to the angle BCD,

And the angle BAC was also proved equal to the angle CDB.

Therefore in parallelogrammic areas the opposite sides and angles are equal to one another.

I say, next, that the diameter also bisects the areas.

For, since AB is equal to CD, and BC is common, the two sides AB, BC are equal to the two sides DC, CB respectively;

Therefore the diameter BC bisects the parallelogram ACDB.

References

Footnotes


  1. parallelogrammic areas
    It is to be observed that, when parallelograms have to be mentioned for the first time, Euclid calls them parallelogrammic areas or, more exactly, parallelogram areas (παραλληλόγραμμα χωρία). The meaning is simply areas bounded by parallel straight lines with the further limitation placed upon the term by Euclid that only four-sided figures are so called, although of course there are certain regular polygons which have opposite sides parallel, and which therefore might be said to be areas bounded by parallel straight lines. We gather from Proclus (p. 393) that the word parallelogram was first introduced by Euclid, that its use was suggested by I. 33, and that the formation of the word παραλληλόγραμμος (parallel-lined) was analogous to that of εὐθύγραμμος (straight-lined or rectilineal). 

  2. DCB
    and DC, CB. The Greek has in these places BCD and CD, BC respectively. Cf. note on I. 33, lines 15, 18. 

Proposition I.35

Parallelograms which are on the same base and in the same parallels are equal to one another.

Let ABCD, EBCF be parallelograms on the same base BC and in the same parallels AF, BC; I say that ABCD is equal to the parallelogram EBCF.

For, since ABCD is a parallelogram,

For the same reason also

and DE is common;

But AB is also equal to DC; I.34 therefore the two sides EA, AB are equal to the two sides FD, DC respectively,

Let DGE be subtracted 2 from each; therefore the trapezium ABGD which remains is equal to the trapezium EGCF which remains. I.c.n.3

Let the triangle GBC be added to each; therefore the whole parallelogram ABCD is equal to the whole parallelogram EBCF. I.c.n.2

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. FDC
    The text has DFC. 

  2. DGE
    Euclid speaks of the triangle DGE without any explanation that, in the case which he takes (where AD, EF have no point in common), BE, CD must meet at a point G between the two parallels. He allows this to appear from the figure simply. 

Proposition I.36

Parallelograms which are on equal bases and in the same parallels are equal to one another.

Let ABCD, EFGH be parallelograms which are on equal bases BC, FG and in the same parallels AH, BG; I say that the parallelogram ABCD is equal to EFGH.

For let BE, CH be joined.

Then, since BC is equal to FG while FG is equal to EH,

But they are also parallel.

And EB, HC join them; but straight lines joining equal and parallel straight lines (at the extremities which are) in the same directions (respectively) are equal and parallel. I.33

Therefore EBCH is a parallelogram. I.34

And it is equal to ABCD; for it has the same base BC with it, and is in the same parallels BC, AH with it. I.35

For the same reason also EFGH is equal to the same EBCH; I.35 so that the parallelogram ABCD is also equal to EFGH. I.c.n.1

Therefore etc.

References

Proposition I.37

Triangles which are on the same base and in the same parallels are equal to one another.

Let ABC, DBC be triangles on the same base BC and in the same parallels AD, BC; I say that the triangle ABC is equal to the triangle DBC.

Let AD be produced in both directions to E, F; through B let BE be drawn parallel to CA, I.31 and through C let CF be drawn parallel to BD. I.31

Then each of the figures EBCA, DBCF is a parallelogram; and they are equal,

for they are on the same base BC and in the same parallels BC, EF. I.35

Moreover the triangle ABC is half of the parallelogram EBCA; for the diameter AB bisects it. I.34

And the triangle DBC is half of the parallelogram DBCF; for the diameter DC bisects it. I.34

[But the halves of equal things are equal to one another.] 1

Therefore the triangle ABC is equal to the triangle DBC.

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. But the halves of equal things are equal to one another
    Here and in the next proposition Heiberg brackets the words But the halves of equal things are equal to one another on the ground that, since the Common Notion which asserted this fact was interpolated at a very early date (before the time of Theon), it is probable that the words here were interpolated at the same time. Cf. note above (p. 224) on the interpolated Common Notion

Proposition I.38

Triangles which are on equal bases and in the same parallels are equal to one another.

Let ABC, DEF be triangles on equal bases BC, EF and in the same parallels BF, AD; I say that the triangle ABC is equal to the triangle DEF.

For let AD be produced in both directions to G, H; through B let BG be drawn parallel to CA, I.31 and through F let FH be drawn parallel to DE.

Then each of the figures GBCA, DEFH is a parallelogram; and GBCA is equal to DEFH;

for they are on equal bases BC, EF and in the same parallels BF, GH. I.36

Moreover the triangle ABC is half of the parallelogram GBCA; for the diameter AB bisects it. I.34

And the triangle FED is half of the parallelogram DEFH; for the diameter DF bisects it. I.34

[But the halves of equal things are equal to one another.]

Therefore the triangle ABC is equal to the triangle DEF.

Therefore etc.

References

Proposition I.39

Equal triangles which are on the same base and on the same side are also in the same parallels.

Let ABC, DBC be equal triangles which are on the same base BC and on the same side of it; [I say that they are also in the same parallels.] 1

And [For] let AD be joined; I say that AD is parallel to BC.

For, if not, let AE be drawn through the point A parallel to the straight line BC, I.31 and let EC be joined.

Therefore the triangle ABC is equal to the triangle EBC; for it is on the same base BC with it and in the same parallels. I.37

But ABC is equal to DBC;

Therefore AE is not parallel to BC.

Similarly we can prove that neither is any other straight line except AD;

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. [I say that they are also in the same parallels.]
    Heiberg has proved (Hermes, XXXVIII., 1903, p. 50) from a recently discovered papyrus-fragment (Fayūm towns and their papyri, p. 96, No. IX.) that these words are an interpolation by some one who did not observe that the words And let AD be joined are part of the setting-out (ἔκθεσις), but took them as belonging to the construction (κατασκευή) and consequently thought that a διορισμός or definition (of the thing to be proved) should precede. The interpolator then altered And into For in the next sentence. 

Proposition I.40

Equal triangles which are on equal bases and on the same side are also in the same parallels

Let ABC, CDE be equal triangles on equal bases BC, CE and on the same side.

I say that they are also in the same parallels.

For let AD be joined; I say that AD is parallel to BE.

For, if not, let AF be drawn through A parallel to BE I.31, and let FE be joined.

Therefore the triangle ABC is equal to the triangle FCE; for they are on equal bases BC, CE and in the same parallels BE, AF. I.38

But the triangle ABC is equal to the triangle DCE;

Similarly we can prove that neither is any other straight line except AD;

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes

Proposition I.41

If a parallelogram have the same base with a triangle and be in the same parallels, the parallelogram is double of the triangle.

For let the parallelogram ABCD have the same base BC with the triangle EBC, and let it be in the same parallels BC, AE;

I say that the parallelogram ABCD is double of the triangle BEC.

For let AC be joined.

Then the triangle ABC is equal to the triangle EBC; for it is on the same base BC with it and in the same parallels BC, AE. I.37

But the parallelogram ABCD is double of the triangle ABC;

Therefore etc.

References

Proposition I.42

To construct, in a given rectilineal angle, a parallelogram equal to a given triangle.

Let ABC be the given triangle, and D the given rectilineal angle; thus it is required to construct in the rectilineal angle D a parallelogram equal to the triangle ABC.

Let BC be bisected at E, and let AE be joined; on the straight line EC, and at the point E on it, let the angle CEF be constructed equal to the angle D; I.23 through A let AG be drawn parallel to EC, and I.31 through C let CG be drawn parallel to EF.

Then FECG is a parallelogram.

And, since BE is equal to EC,

But the parallelogram FECG is also double of the triangle AEC, for it has the same base with it and is in the same parallels with it; I.41

And it has the angle CEF equal to the given angle D.

Therefore the parallelogram FECG has been constructed equal to the given triangle ABC, in the angle CEF which is equal to D.

References

Proposition I.43

In any parallelogram the complements 1 of the parallelograms about the diameter are equal to one another.

Let ABCD be a parallelogram, and AC its diameter; and about AC let EH, FG be parallelograms, and BK, KD 2 the so-called complements;

I say that the complement BK is equal to the complement KD.

For, since ABCD is a parallelogram, and AC its diameter,

Again, since EH is a parallelogram, and AK is its diameter,

For the same reason

Now, since the triangle AEK is equal to the triangle AHK,

the triangle AEK together with KGC is equal to the triangle AHK together with KFC. I.c.n.2

And the whole triangle ABC is also equal to the whole ADC; therefore the complement BK which remains is equal to the complement KD which remains. I.c.n.3

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. complements,

    παραπληρώματα

  2. and about AC....
    Euclid's phraseology here and in the next proposition implies that the complements as well as the other parallelograms are about the diagonal. The words are here περὶ δὲ τὴν ΑΓ παραλληλόγραμμα μὲν ἔστω τὰ ΕΘ, ΖΗ, τὰ δὲ λεγόμενα παραπληρώματα τὰ ΒΚ, ΚΔ. The expression the so-called complements indicates that this technical use of παραπληρώματα was not new, though it might not be universally known. 

Proposition I.44

To a given straight line to apply, in a given rectilineal angle, a parallelogram equal to a given triangle.

Let AB be the given straight line, C the given triangle and D the given rectilineal angle; thus it is required to apply to the given straight line AB, in an angle equal to the angle D, a parallelogram equal to the given triangle C.

Let the parallelogram BEFG be constructed equal to the triangle C, in the angle EBG which is equal to D I.42; let it be placed so that BE is in a straight line with AB; letFG be drawn through to H, and let AH be drawn through A parallel to either BG or EF. I.31

Let HB be joined.

Then, since the straight line HF falls upon the parallels AH, EF, 1

Therefore the angles BHG, GFE are less than two right angles; and straight lines produced indefinitely from angles less than two right angles meet; I.post.5

Let them be produced and meet at K; through the point K let KL be drawn parallel to either EA or FH, I.31 and let HA, GB be produced to the points L, M.

Then HLKF is a parallelogram, HK is its diameter, and AG, ME are parallelograms. and LB, BF the so-called complements, about HK;

But BF is equal to the triangle C;

And, since the angle GBE is equal to the angle ABM, I.15

Therefore the parallelogram LB equal to the given triangle C has been applied to the given straight line AB, in the angle ABM which is equal to D.

References

Footnotes


  1. since the straight line HF falls...."
    The verb is in the aorist (ὲνέπεσεν) here and in similar expressions in the following propositions. 

Proposition I.45

To construct, in a given rectilineal angle, a parallelogram equal to a given rectilineal figure.

Let ABCD be the given rectilineal figure 1 and E the given rectilineal angle; thus it is required to construct, in the given angle E, a parallelogram equal to the rectilineal figure ABCD.

Let DB be joined, and let the parallelogram FH be constructed equal to the triangle ABD, in the angle HKF which is equal to E; I.42 let the parallelogram GM equal to the triangle DBC be applied to the straight line GH, in the angle GHM which is equal to E. I.44

Then, since the angle E is equal to each of the angles HKF, GHM,

Let the angle KHG be added to each; therefore the angles FKH, KHG are equal to the angles KHG, GHM.

But the angles FKH, KHG are equal to two right angles; I.29 therefore the angles KHG, GHM are also equal to two right angles.

Thus, with a straight line GH, and at the point H on it, two straight lines KH, HM not lying on the same side make the adjacent angles equal to two right angles;

And, since the straight line HG falls upon the parallels KM, FG, the alternate angles MHG, HGF are equal to one another. I.29

Let the angle HGL be added to each; therefore the angles MHG, HGL are equal to the angles HGF, HGL. [I.c.n.2]

But the angles MHG, HGL are equal to two right angles; I.29 therefore the angles HGF, HGL are also equal to two right angles. [I.c.n.1]

And, since FK is equal and parallel to HG, I.34

KF is also equal and parallel to ML; [I.c.n.1;1.30] and the straight lines KM, FL join them (at their extremities); therefore KM, FL are also equal and parallel. I.33

And, since the triangle ABD is equal to the parallelogram FH,

the whole rectilineal figure ABCD is equal to the whole parallelogram KFLM.

Therefore the parallelogram KFLM has been constructed equal to the given rectilineal figure ABCD, in the angle FKM which is equal to the given angle E.

References

Footnotes


  1. rectilineal figure, in the Greek

    rectilineal

Proposition I.46

On a given straight line to describe a square.

Let AB be the given straight line; thus it is required to describe a square on the straight line AB. 1

Let AC be drawn at right angles to the straight line AB from the point A on it I.11, and let AD be made equal to AB; through the point D let DE be drawn parallel to AB, and through the point B let BE be drawn parallel to AD. I.31

Therefore ADEB is a parallelogram;

But AB is equal to AD;

therefore the parallelogram ADEB is equilateral.

I say next that it is also right-angled.

For, since the straight line AD falls upon the parallels AB, DE,

But the angle BAD is right;

And in parallelogrammic areas the opposite sides and angles are equal to one another; I.34

And it was also proved equilateral.

Therefore it is a square; and it is described on the straight line AB.

References

Footnotes


  1. construct
    Proclus (p. 423, 18 sqq.) note the difference between the word construct (συστἡσασθαι) applied by Euclid to the construction of a triangle (and, he might have added, of an angle) and the words describe on (ἀναγράφειν ἀπό) used of drawing a square on a given straight line as one side. The triangle (or angle) is, so to say, pieced together, while the describing of a square on a given straight line is the making of a figure from one side, and corresponds to the multiplication of the number representing the side by itself. 

Proposition I.47

In right-angled triangles the square on 1 the side subtending the right angle 2 is equal to the squares on the sides containing the right angle.

Let ABC be a right-angled triangle having the angle BAC right;

I say that the square on BC is equal to the squares on BA, AC.

For let there be described on BC the square BDEC, and on BA, AC the squares GB, HC; I.46 through A let AL be drawn parallel to either BD or CE, and let AD, FC be joined.

Then, since each of the angles BAC, BAG is right, it follows that with a straight line BA, and at the point A on it, the two straight lines AC, AG not lying on the same side make the adjacent angles equal to two right angles;

For the same reason

And, since the angle DBC is equal to the angle FBA: for each is right: let the angle ABC be added to each;

And, since DB is equal to BC, and FB to BA, the two sides AB, BD are equal to the two sides FB, BC respectively, 3

Now the parallelogram BL is double of the triangle ABD, for they have the same base BD and are in the same parallels BD, AL. I.41

And the square GB is double of the triangle FBC, for they again have the same base FB and are in the same parallels FB, GC. I.41

[But the doubles of equals are equal to one another.] 4

Similarly, if AE, BK be joined, the parallelogram CL can also be proved equal to the square HC;

And the square BDEC is described on BC,

Therefore the square on the side BC is equal to the squares on the sides BA, AC.

Therefore etc.

References

Footnotes


  1. the square on
    , τὸ ἀπὸ...τετρἁγωνον, the word ἀναγραφέν or ἀναγεγραμμένον being understood. 

  2. subtending the right angle.
    Here ὑποτεινούσης, subtending, is used with the simple accusative (τὴν ὀρθὴν γωνίαν) instead of being followed by ὑπό and the accusative, which seems to be the original and more orthodox construction. Cf. I. 18, note. 

  3. the two sides AB, BD....
    Euclid actually writes DB, BA, and therefore the equal sides in the two triangles are not mentioned in corresponding order, though he adheres to the words ἑκατέρα ἑκατέρα respectively. Here DB is equal to BC and BA to FB

  4. [But the doubles of equals are equal to one another.]
    Heiberg brackets these words as an interpolation, since it quotes a Common Notion which is itself interpolated. Cf. note on I. 37, p. 332, and on interpolated Common Notions, pp. 223-4. 

Proposition I.48

If in a triangle the square on one of the sides be equal to the squares on the remaining two sides of the triangle, the angle contained by the remaining two sides of the triangle is right.

For in the triangle ABC let the square on one side BC be equal to the squares on the sides BA, AC;

I say that the angle BAC is right.

For let AD be drawn from the point A at right angles to the straight line AC, let AD be made equal to BA, and let DC be joined.

Since DA is equal to AB, the square on DA is also equal to the square on AB.

Let the square on AC be added to each;

But the square on DC is equal to the squares on DA, AC, for the angle DAC is right; I.47 and the square on BC is equal to the squares on BA, AC, for this is the hypothesis;

And, since DA is equal to AB, and AC is common,

and the base DC is equal to the base BC;

But the angle DAC is right;

Therefore etc.

References